Carly Fiorina: Supporting a free Internet means supporting child rape?


Carly Fiorina truly is panicked. The NRSC has been spooked by the Scozzafava/Hoffman/Owens race, and is more or less going to leave Fiorina out to dry. And while she got the support of conservative favorite Tom Coburn to match Chuck DeVore’s Jim DeMint, the rest of her supporters paint a different picture. Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Olympia Snowe, Lisa Murkowski: to many of us, these are what is wrong with the Republican Senate caucus.

So now she’s launched prematurely, shot the wad of endorsements she has in the middle of a week, rushed to pander to the right by appearing in the OC Register, but even that’s not enough. Now she’s making outrageous attacks on Chuck DeVore and the rest of us who favor an Internet free of burdensome government regulation.

Read More →


The LA Times Answers Stem Cells FAQs with Frequently Stated Misconceptions


Just because a question is frequently asked doesn't mean it should get a shoddy answer.

The Los Angeles Times does a genuine disservice to its readers in its analysis of President Barack Obama’s decision to dramatically expand federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. The analysis purports to answer frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding stem cells in general and the controversy over embryonic stem cells. But what the Times produces instead is not a list of answers, but a recitation of frequently stated misconceptions (FSMs), half-truths, and outright lies about President Bush’s landmark decision to allow funding for the research for the first time, and the impact that Barack Obama’s rescinding of that decision will have on the research going forward.

We’ll take the questions and “answers” one by one below the fold.

Read More →


New York Times Endorses ‘Anti-Science’ Stem Cell Position


Nothing like intellectual honesty, eh?

In its review of President Obama’s expected reversal of the Bush Administration’s policy on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, the New York Times swerves into the truth, repudiating the mainstream media’s position on the Bush policy to date. The Times now says the following about the heretofore derided Bush stem cell policy:

“But in August 2001, in a careful compromise, President Bush opened the door a tiny crack, by ordering that tax dollars could be used for studies on a small number of lines, or colonies, of stem cells already extracted from embryos – so long as federal researchers did not do the extraction themselves.”

Of course, rational people have always known that Bush’s stem cells decision was carefully crafted and appropriately balanced on scientific and ethical grounds. But that is not the position the left media took during subsequent political campaigns.

Read More →


The Most Radically Pro-Abortion President in History


There's no other way to say it.

The Obama Administration will announce next week that President Obama has decided to scrap regulations put in place by President Bush designed to protect health care workers from being forced to participate in abortions, sterilizations, and contraceptive procedures on moral grounds.  The rules were intended as an enforcement mechanism.  They expanded on existing federal law protecting conscientious doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other health care workers by requiring hospitals to certify that they comply with the law in order to continue to be eligible for federal funding.  In other words, the rules did nothing new, they simply ensured that the existing law was not ignored.

There can be no doubt now that Barack Obama is the most radically pro-abortion president in history, except among the most brain-addled and delusional fever swamps of the left.  This move, together with Obama’s history and two other abortion related decisions in his young Administration proves it.  I used the term “pro-abortion” in my story on the abortion rules at AOL’s Political Machine and drew the ire of one liberal commenter, who called it, “symantics gymnastics.”  But why?  Liberals believe abortion is a good thing.  If Obama is pro-abortion, that just means he is on their side.

Furthermore, the left likes to have its positions characterized in a positive light and conservative ones cast negatively.  Hence the labels “pro-choice” and “anti-choice.”  Since we all know choice equals abortion – it’s the only choice the left supports – let’s have truth in labeling.  President Obama is pro-abortion while his conservative opponents are anti-abortion. Works for me.

Read More →


“I always will come down on the side of life”


Alaska Governor Sarah Palin released a statement today, responding to an e-mail campaign started in September by pro-abortion activists calling for donations to be made to Planned Parenthood on Palin’s behalf. The former GOP vice presidential candidate is a staunch opponent of the grisly practice of abortion.

Read More →